San Antonio Spurs vs Portland Trail Blazers Match Player Stats: Full Box Score, Leaders and Key Takeaways

Introduction

The San Antonio Spurs vs Portland Trail Blazers match player stats tell a fairly clear story from the latest meeting between these teams. San Antonio won 114-95 on April 28, 2026, in Game 5 of their Western Conference first-round playoff series, advancing to the semifinals with a 4-1 series victory.

Victor Wembanyama wasn’t San Antonio’s leading scorer, but his 17 points, 14 rebounds and six blocks made him one of the most influential players on the floor. De’Aaron Fox led the Spurs with 21 points and nine assists, while Julian Champagnie added 19 points on an outstanding 6-of-9 shooting night, including 5-of-7 from three-point range.

For Portland, Deni Avdija led the team with 22 points, but the Trail Blazers struggled badly from the field, shooting just 35.1% overall and 23.4% from three.

Quick Answer: Who led the Spurs vs Trail Blazers in player stats?

Here are the biggest individual numbers from the April 28 matchup:

The headline matchup wasn’t simply about scoring. San Antonio’s combination of efficient shooting, rebounding and interior defense separated the teams. Wembanyama’s six blocks were especially important, while Fox controlled the offense with nine assists.

San Antonio Spurs player stats

San Antonio finished the game shooting 54.7% from the field, including 40.0% from three-point range. The Spurs also collected 42 rebounds and handed out 27 assists.

De’Aaron Fox

Fox was the Spurs’ top scorer with 21 points, going 8-for-14 from the field and 2-for-5 from three. He also had nine assists, three rebounds and one steal in 33:54.

His fourth quarter was particularly effective. Fox scored 13 points in the final period, shooting 6-for-8 from the field. That helped San Antonio maintain control rather than allowing Portland’s late push to become a serious threat.

Julian Champagnie

Champagnie delivered perhaps the cleanest shooting performance of the night.

He scored 19 points in 29:58, making 6 of 9 shots overall and an excellent 5 of 7 from three-point range. He also grabbed seven rebounds and recorded three assists.

His efficiency mattered because San Antonio didn’t need to rely exclusively on Fox or Wembanyama for offense. Portland had to respect the perimeter, which opened additional room for San Antonio’s other creators.

Victor Wembanyama

Wembanyama finished with 17 points, 14 rebounds and six blocks while shooting 5-for-7 from the floor and 6-for-6 at the free-throw line.

The 14 rebounds gave him a double-double, but the six blocks are arguably the most revealing number. Portland had difficulty getting comfortable around the rim, and Wembanyama’s defensive presence changed the value of several possessions even when he wasn’t directly involved in the play.

He also finished with three assists and just one turnover.

Dylan Harper

Harper produced an efficient 17-point performance off the bench.

He shot 6-for-9 from the floor and made his only three-point attempt. He added three rebounds and three steals in 25:39.

That was an important contribution from the second unit. San Antonio wasn’t forced to stretch its starters for every offensive possession, and Harper gave the team another reliable scoring option.

Stephon Castle

Castle scored 15 points, shooting 6-for-11 overall. He also contributed five assists, three rebounds and one block.

His seven turnovers stand out as the negative statistic, though. San Antonio’s overall offensive performance was strong enough to absorb those mistakes.

Portland Trail Blazers player stats

Portland’s individual numbers were more uneven. The Trail Blazers scored 95 points and shot only 33 of 94 from the field. Their 11-for-47 performance from three-point range was a major problem, too.

Deni Avdija

Avdija was Portland’s leading scorer with 22 points.

He went 7-for-15 from the field and 7-for-11 at the free-throw line. He also recorded three rebounds, three assists and one block.

The issue was efficiency from deep: Avdija made just 1 of 6 three-point attempts. Portland needed more perimeter production on a night when San Antonio was consistently scoring at the other end.

Jerami Grant

Grant finished with 12 points, six field-goal attempts and seven free-throw attempts. He made only 2 of 6 shots from the field but converted 7 of 8 free throws.

He also had two steals and one assist in 16:43.

Grant’s limited minutes reflected how the game developed. San Antonio established a sizeable lead early, and Portland couldn’t generate enough offense to force a different rotation pattern.

Robert Williams III

Williams was one of Portland’s more efficient contributors, scoring 11 points on 5-of-10 shooting.

He also grabbed seven rebounds, had one assist and one steal in 16:53.

His offensive rebounding and interior play provided some useful moments, but Portland needed more production across the rotation.

Donovan Clingan

Clingan finished with 10 points, five rebounds and six assists.

His six assists are easy to overlook because of the low scoring total, but they were actually the second-highest assist total on the Portland roster. He shot 4-for-11 from the floor and 2-for-7 from three, which was not enough to make San Antonio pay consistently inside or outside.

Toumani Camara and Jrue Holiday

Camara struggled offensively, scoring seven points on 2-of-10 shooting and making only 1 of 7 three-point attempts. He did contribute eight rebounds.

Holiday scored eight points and provided seven assists, but his shooting was a major issue: 3-for-14 overall and 1-for-6 from three.

Those shooting numbers explain a lot about Portland’s offensive problems.

The biggest statistical difference: shooting

The most obvious difference in the box score was shooting efficiency.

San Antonio:

41-of-75 from the field — 54.7%

12-of-30 from three — 40.0%

20-of-29 free throws — 69.0%

Portland:

33-of-94 from the field — 35.1%

11-of-47 from three — 23.4%

18-of-23 free throws — 78.3%

The free-throw numbers actually favored Portland in percentage terms, but that couldn’t compensate for the massive difference in field-goal efficiency.

San Antonio also had a 42-38 rebounding advantage and a 27-24 edge in assists.

Those aren’t enormous margins by themselves. The shooting gap is what turned the game into a comfortable Spurs victory.

How the game unfolded

San Antonio didn’t spend the night chasing Portland. The Spurs jumped ahead 36-24 after the first quarter and extended the advantage to 65-45 by halftime. Portland won the fourth quarter 30-28, but by then the damage was already done.

The final quarter therefore looks closer than the game actually felt.

San Antonio’s biggest lead reached 28 points, according to the NBA game data. The Spurs also never trailed.

That early separation made the player stats more interesting than the final score alone suggests. Fox could attack efficiently, Wembanyama could concentrate on defense and rebounding, and the Spurs’ shooters found clean opportunities without having to play from behind.

What the full series says about these teams

The Game 5 numbers fit the broader outcome of the series.

San Antonio won the first-round matchup 4-1, although Portland did manage to win Game 2 in San Antonio, 106-103. Scoot Henderson scored a playoff career-high 31 points in that game, and the Trail Blazers took advantage after Wembanyama left following a concussion.

The series therefore wasn’t completely one-sided.

But over five games, San Antonio’s size, defensive versatility and offensive efficiency proved too difficult for Portland to overcome. The Spurs eventually moved on to the Western Conference semifinals.

There’s also an interesting contrast between the regular season and playoffs. During the 2025-26 regular season, the teams split their three meetings: San Antonio won 115-102 on November 26, Portland won 115-110 on January 3, and San Antonio won 112-101 on April 8.

That makes the postseason result more meaningful. Portland had already shown it could beat San Antonio, but sustaining that level across a playoff series was a different challenge.

Expert insight: the box score tells more than the scoring leaders

If you only look at the top scorer, Avdija appears to have won the individual battle against San Antonio’s stars. He scored 22 points, compared with 21 for Fox and 17 for Wembanyama.

But that’s not how this game was decided.

Wembanyama’s 14 rebounds and six blocks, Fox’s nine assists, and Champagnie’s 5-for-7 three-point shooting collectively had a bigger effect on the game than raw scoring totals.

That’s a useful lesson when reading NBA player stats. Points tell you who finished possessions. They don’t always tell you who controlled them.

A player can score 20 points while having a limited overall impact, while another player can influence a game through rebounds, rim protection, passing, defensive attention and efficient shooting.

This game was a good example.

What to look for in future Spurs vs Trail Blazers matchups

For anyone following future San Antonio Spurs vs Portland Trail Blazers games, several statistical categories are worth checking beyond the final score:

Wembanyama’s defensive numbers
Blocks and rebounds can quickly show whether Portland is getting comfortable attacking the paint.

Three-point efficiency
Portland shot only 23.4% from three in the latest matchup. A substantial improvement from outside would dramatically change the offensive picture.

Fox’s playmaking
His nine assists showed how important his ability to create for others was in Game 5.

Portland’s secondary scoring
Avdija led the Trail Blazers with 22, but Portland needed more efficient contributions from Holiday, Camara and others.

Turnovers
San Antonio committed 17 turnovers, while Portland had only nine. Despite that advantage for Portland, the Trail Blazers couldn’t overcome their shooting problems.

That’s another reason not to evaluate a basketball game from one statistic alone.

Final Takeaway

The latest San Antonio Spurs vs Portland Trail Blazers match player stats show why San Antonio advanced. De’Aaron Fox supplied efficient scoring and playmaking, Julian Champagnie punished Portland from three, and Victor Wembanyama controlled the defensive end with 14 rebounds and six blocks.

Portland had a 22-point performance from Deni Avdija and some useful contributions from Robert Williams III and Donovan Clingan, but the team’s 35.1% shooting overall and 23.4% from three were simply too inefficient against a Spurs team shooting 54.7%.

The 114-95 final score wasn’t just about one superstar having a huge scoring night. It was the result of San Antonio getting efficient production from several players at once—and that’s what ultimately ended Portland’s playoff run.

Visit also : probuz.co.uk